 Remake: Possibly the most dreaded word in all of film geek-dom.
Remake: Possibly the most dreaded word in all of film geek-dom.Or if you prefer, reimagining...
Plenty of people would argue there are no good remakes. These people would be misinformed. A majority of people would cite that John Carpenter's 1982 remake of The Thing is superior to the original 1951 version. Another group - myself included - would say Philip Kaufman's Invasion of the Body Snatchers is better than Don Siegel's.
I see it like this...
Stories have been passed down and retold in some form or another for centuries but only in this past one, the Goliath known as the 20th, have these reformed, redone, remade stories been scrutinized in such a mass way. Or perhaps not. I don't currently have any newspaper clippings from 1867 or literary journals from 1768 (Were there any lit journals in 1768), or soundbites from the man on the street in 1434 
No, today I present to you the first of a slew of stories that could possibly be remade, adapted or what have you... and have a chance of being just as relevant, just as good, or even better than older versions.
 Herk Harvey's and John Clifford's 1962 cult classic about a woman who survives a freak drag racing accident, and then is subsequently haunted by a ghoul of a man on her way to a new job in Utah has in fact already been remade... by Wes Craven! Scratch that, it was presented by Craven... Looking at the plot synopsis provided by the ever reliable IMDb (note sarcasm), this 1998 version doesn't even sound remotely like the '62 original, minus the title and a car crashing into a river. Perhaps more similarities would become apparent if I saw the thing, but I have no desire to. Not because it is a remake, but because it looks like plain old garbage.
Herk Harvey's and John Clifford's 1962 cult classic about a woman who survives a freak drag racing accident, and then is subsequently haunted by a ghoul of a man on her way to a new job in Utah has in fact already been remade... by Wes Craven! Scratch that, it was presented by Craven... Looking at the plot synopsis provided by the ever reliable IMDb (note sarcasm), this 1998 version doesn't even sound remotely like the '62 original, minus the title and a car crashing into a river. Perhaps more similarities would become apparent if I saw the thing, but I have no desire to. Not because it is a remake, but because it looks like plain old garbage.
The Ingmar Bergman and Jean Cocteau inspired surrealism of 
Now if we set this in 
Our nightmare needs to be grounded in a certain reality. For this, let's turn to the example of Hiroshi Teshigahara's self proclaimed "documentary fantasy."
Watch the first part of this clip and then move onto the 2nd:
In sculpting a retelling of Carnival of Souls, it is best to steer clear of modern horror elements such as excessive gore and cheap, jumpy scares. To honor 
Stay tuned for next time when we will discuss... THEM!
In the meantime, why not comment with your own thoughts or remake ideas. Participation means a happier tomorrow. 
 


 

 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 

No comments:
Post a Comment